考情回想 2020年11月29日托福考试概况回想!

  • A+
所属分类:商务英语

1. 社会:美国的打猎活动,包括人员多了打猎变多,西部文明打猎和时节性搬场吃食物逐渐传抵达平原,在天然本钱丰厚的加利福利尼亚树立了首个固久居住地,密西西比邻近forest-efficiency

参阅 Tpo14 Pastrolism in Ancient Inner Eurasia

2. 前史:中世纪欧洲工厂的构成,手作业坊,还有乡下的家庭出产 参阅

Tpo49 Background for the industrial revolution

3. 前史:欧洲乡镇的来历和打开

参阅Tpo51 Memphis, Egypt’s first capital

4. 前史:玛雅文明(论题重复20201101,20200912

参阅 Tpo58 The rise of classic Mayan civilization

Tpo 55 Mesolithic complexity in Scandinavia

5. 生物:维管植物(Vascular plants)抵挡干旱的方法

参阅Tpo22 Spartina Tpo44 Seagrasses

6. 生物:生物之间的交流

参阅Tpo17 symbiotic relationships

7. 地舆:冰川(Glaciers)讲冰川移动的几个缘由, 然后冰川运动遇到阻止会发生一个什 么表象之类

参阅Tpo15 Glacier formation

8. 地舆:大陆漂移的理论(论题重复20201114)

参阅Tpo56 Alfred Webber’s theory of continental drift

听力有些

LECTURE:

1. 长建筑,由动力使用抉择的方案,然后里边有迷宫相同的规划可以坚持热量

这篇归于艺术类讲座,一般有建筑,音乐,雕刻,戏曲等。所以需要掌控,各类型文章的学科单词。下面是一篇绘画类讲座片段,同学们可以进行学习和参阅

参阅片段

Painters created portraits that were very complementary and people sometimes ended up looking nothing like their real selves, a fact which doesn't make this investigative process easier. //画家会对其创造的肖像进行完善,究竟我们会看上去与他们真实的形象不符,这一实际让整个查询进程变得更凌乱。

Now, one art historian is very doubtful of the claims that this is Shakespeare. However, she has different reasons than the tones I pointed out. //如今,一位艺术史学家非常质疑此莎士比亚肖像的真实性。可是,她所持的理由与作者早年指出的观念并纷歧样。

To the historians' way of thinking, and mine too, 1 might add this portrait is most likely of a completely different individual. //根据前史学家与作者自己的思维方法,我们可以认为这幅肖像极有可所以在描绘一个完全不一样的人。

You’re probably thinking, wait a minute, you said the Earl of Southhampton was the original owner of this portrait and that he was a very public supporter of Shakespeare. Oh, yes, that's true. However, here's the twist. //你可以会想,等一下,你刚刚说南安普敦伯爵是这幅肖像的原主人,他是莎士比亚的揭露撑持者。嗯,是的,这是真的。

Apparently the Earl of Southampton was also a very local supporter of Sir Thomas Overbury, one of his political allies. //可是,这是一个转机点。显着,南安普敦伯爵正好也是托马斯·奥弗伯里爵士的一名当地撑持者和政治盟友。

During that fine period, it wouldn't be at all unusual to have an ally’s portrait in your collection. //在那个夸姣的时期,自个保藏中有一副盟友的肖像是很寻常的作业。

Additionally, documented portraits of Sir Thomas Overbury looked incredibly similar to the controversial painting. //此外,托马斯·奥弗伯里爵士记载在案的肖像与这幅争议画像非常类似。

They are a match with regard to age, facial shape, attire, and they both share an intriguing detail. In the documented portraits of Overbury his left ear has a characteristic shape. //在年纪,脸型,服装等方面彼此匹配,细节处也很类似。在托马斯记载在案的肖像中,他的左耳形状特别。

You can't really see it while in the image I showed you. But the ear of the man in the Cobbe Portrait has the same peculiar shape.//可是在我向您展示的图像中,您无法真实看到肖像的左耳。可是科布肖像中男人的耳朵也具有相同的独特形状。

2. 共生的三种方法,寄生、共存和互利共生,一起也有两种一起存在的情况,比方昆虫体内一起有一种细菌和微生物,微生物分泌抗菌素杀掉其他细菌,细菌又把昆虫内脏分界以供子孙子孙。所以昆虫是被寄生,其他两种是互利共生

共生联络是常考的听力内容,因而今日的托福考试标题中规中矩,在以往的真题里也有关于的讲座,如以下片段

Okay. So there're parasitism, commensalism, and oh, mutualism.

Professor

Well. The amphipod does seek out the butterflies, so there must be some advantage for the amphipod. Is it for protection? Somehow the butterfly protects it?

Professor

好吧。所以有寄生,共栖,还有互利共生。

好。蜥脚类动物的确会寻找蝴蝶,所以对蜥脚类动物来说必定有一些优势。是为了维护吗?蝴蝶会维护它吗?

Exactly. Very good. And it was interesting. The hypothesis researchers started with was the predators of the amphipods were responding to visual cue.

完全正确。极好。这很风趣。研讨人员开始的假定是蜥脚类动物的捕食者会对视觉条理做出反应。

They saw the amphipod and sea butterfly together and turned away.

他们看到片脚类动物和海蝴蝶在一同,就回身走开了。

However, this turned out not to be the case. In a lab experiment, these predatory fish were presented with two kinds of food pellets. One contains just fish meat and one contains both fish meat and chemicals from sea butterflies.

可是,实际并非如此。在一项实验室实验中,研讨人员给这些掠食性鱼类供给两种食物丸。一种只富含鱼肉,另一种既富含鱼肉又富含来自海蝴蝶的化学物质。

It turns out that the predators rejected only the food pellets containing the sea butterfly chemicals. But getting back to our classification system, this type of symbiotic relationship between the amphipod and the sea butterfly is something new.

成果是,捕食者只架空富含海蝴蝶化学物质的食物颗粒。回到咱们的分类体系,这种片脚类动物和海蝴蝶之间的共生联络是新的。

When you think carefully about it, none of the three existing categories can really be applied in a situation- This may be a special case.

当你细心思考时,你会发现这三种现有的品种都不能真实使用于某一情况——这可所以一种特别情况。

A type of symbiosis with both organisms are disadvantaged and yet one is ultimately protected from its predators by actively kidnapping the other.

与两种生物共存的一品种型都处于晦气方位,但其间一种究竟会经过主动劫持另一种而免受捕食者的损伤。

考情回想 2020年11月29日托福考试概况回想!插图
口语有些

独立口语Task1

Should professors get promoted and pay raises when students give them positive evaluation?

翻译:教授应不大约因为获得学生的活泼评价而升职加薪?

答复“附和”的思路:

学生的活泼评价旁边面反映(indirectly reflect)教授们的教育质量(teaching quality)。细节上说,也就是学生满足教授的授课方法(coouse delivery),作业反应(feedback),师生交流等方面。能做到让学生满足以上方面,这位教师值得升职加薪。

从教师的视点来说,要得到学生全部的活泼评价意味着在作业上要愈加细心担任,备课(preparing a class)时的思考要愈加周全(careful and considerate ),做到把学生放在第一位(student-centred)。可以在教育上做到以上的教授,值得升职加薪。

答复“不附和”的思路:

这会影响到教育的中心(core of teaching),因为为了得到学生好的评价,有些教授的作业重心可以会从教授常识转移(shift)到如何取悦学生(please students)。他们很可以会降低对学生的需求(requirements),或许在课上过度(overly)的夸奖学生,这对前进学生的才能和专业常识都是晦气的。

从学生视点来说,他们对教授的评价不可专业客观(professional and objective),太多时分会豪情用事(involve personal feelings)。他们可以会因为拿了一个低分而给教授负面的评价,也有可以朴实喜爱教授的表面(appearance)或穿戴(clothing)而给予好的评价。

归纳口语TASK2

History department想树立一个课程网站(course website)给学生供给documents和handouts

女人 Agree

第一个缘由:在一个当地查看course的信息好,handouts简略丢掉,假定丢掉可以在上面下载。

第二个缘由:可以在website上文教授和同学疑问(post questions),因为在温习(review)时常常遇到疑问,可以在课外问教授或许与同学谈论疑问

归纳口语TASK3

Sales Strategy - Pros and Cons Closing

在出售的时分先说drawbacks,再提出benefits可以抵达非常好的出售作用。

举例教授当年在卖house的时分,一初步只说house的pros,他的出售成果还行;

可是后来火伴奉告大约先说drawbacks(比方换地板),再说这个房子的利益(比方说good lighting / location),他的出售成果就非常好了。

归纳口语TASK4

animals用两种办法让羽翼坚持温暖

1. warm up their muscles

羽翼改动视点(adjust angle)以非常好的吸收太阳光,使得羽翼保暖。

2. generate heat

在飞之前经过快速击打羽翼以发生热量。

写作有些

归纳写作

阅览材料的观念:货船运用的燃料“heavy fuel oil (n.重燃油)”会污染空气。关于这个疑问,阅览材料提出了三种替代重燃油的新动力:“biofuel”,“hydrogen”和“wind power”。

听力材料提出的驳论:

1. 实际中并没有满足的农场来发生满足的“biofuel”;此外“biofuel”的出产还受气候和人员等要素制约,因而阅览材料的第一个方案不可以行。

2. 燃烧氢动力然后供给动力的机器是无量且重型的设备。要把这样的设备设备在货船上并不可以行,然后驳斥了阅览材料的第二个提案。

3. 依托风力给货船供给动力并不可以行:因为风向和风力不可以控制,而且风向和货船的航线并不老是共同的。使用风能作为货船的动力很可以会致使货船绕远路。

独立写作

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Is it always right for government to ask people to move their businesses and houses to provide space for the construction of large structures (new roads, new dams, etc.)?

参阅表述:

1、removaln. 移除

2、relocationn. 迁徙,集结,从头装备

3、legitimateadj. 有合理理由的

4、justifiable/warrantedadj. 合理的

5、coercionn.强逼

这篇文章系沃邦教育托福教研组自创,如需转发请至大众号后台与咱们获得联络,并获取转发授权。

发表评论

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen: